Creationsism in a Science Class?

On a national level, the state of Alabama has a horrible reputation for its science standards specified in the Alabama Course of Study: Science (ACOS). The ACOS is used as a foundation for local schools when developing their curriculum. It is my understanding that local school can improve upon the ACOS but must meet the minium requirements specified therein.

According to a state-by-state study of science standards by the Thomas B. Fordam Institute, the state of Alabama received a grade of "F" for our science standards. The study took major points off of Alabama's treatment of one of the cornerstones of modern biology, Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution.

The National Academy of Sciences recently released a new booklet entitled "Science, Evolution, and Creationism." You can listen to or read a free version of this excellent resource by clicking here.

From their website, "This completely updated edition of the landmark booklet Science and Creationism is written for anyone who wants to learn more about the science of evolution. It provides a succinct overview of the many recent advances from the fossil record, molecular biology, and a new field known as evolutionary-developmental biology that have yielded important, new, and overwhelming evidence for evolution. It makes clear that the study of evolution remains one of the most active, robust, and far-reaching fields in all of modern science." .This booklet is a must-read for anyone who cares about the scientific literacy of Alabama children.

At the end of the day I don't care if our students graduate without knowing their fermions from their bosons, their Australopithecus Afarensis from their Homo Habilis or even their Charles Darwin from their Issac Newton. No, the most valuable thing kids can take from our science classes it is that they develop rational, critical thinking skills and the ability to understand how to reason objectively. That will not happen as long as we allow dogma into the science class.

Federal Funding for Abstinance Education in Jeopardy

School boards across the nation may be forced to deal with this Abstinence-only police sooner rather than later:

Click here for the full article from the Atlanta Journal and Constitution:

Excerpt:

Future of abstinence-only federal funding in limbo

New York —- With the exit of the Bush administration, critics of abstinence-only sex education will be making an aggressive push to cut off federal funding for what they consider an ineffective, sometimes harmful program.

How quickly and completely they reach their goal is uncertain, however, as conservative supporters of abstinence education lobby Congress and President-elect Barack Obama to preserve at least some of the funding, which now totals $176 million a year.

And even if federal funding is halted, some states —- such as Georgia —- are determined to keep abstinence programs going on their own, ensuring that this front in the culture wars will remain active.

Obama is considered an advocate of comprehensive sex education, which —- unlike abstinence-only curriculum —- includes advice to young people about using contraceptives if they do engage in sexual activity. However, Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor declined to elaborate on what the new president would propose in his own budget plan.

TimesDaily Article on Teen Pregnancy

Wow. Lisa Singleton-Rickman wrote an excellent article on teen pregnancy in the Shoals area. I hope her articles will serve to open the dialogue between the school board and community with regard to teen sex, birth control, STDs and pregnancy.

See the articles here and here.

Good job, Lisa.

Corporal Punishment Nightmare

One of my worst nightmares occurred at our last Board of Education meeting last Tuesday.

A young lady came to speak before the board concerning some issues she had with the principal at her school. As she was explaining her dilemma withe the school principal*, she informed the board that her child was paddled by the principal (or assistant). This kind of punishment is perfectly legal under Alabama law as noted in a previous post.

The problem with this one is that this mother claims that there was a note in the child's personal file that he shall not be paddled. If that note is in there then my school system has not only inflicted physical harm upon a small child, it has also opened itself up to litigation.

This kind of situation opens up a whole slew of uncomfortable scenarios. Now, as far as I know, the child in question at this board meeting is from a perfectly normal, no-abusive family. BUT, what if this child was a victim of some sort of physical abuse? What if the mom didn't want him paddled because he had endured years of therapy and a single paddling might set him back years?

Does the state have a right to further inflict physical harm upon a child that is used to receiving beatings? Of course not!

*Note that I am certain the administration is doing everything they can to accomodate this young woman's concerns.